We’re back! Sorry it has been so long but we’re here to rinse the fur off journalism’s teeth and ask the question - are you a dick?
Lyra McKee of media news aggregation site MediaGazer wrote this blogpost condemning some journalists, especially those in tech of being dicks, abusing their position and acting bigger than the story. This prompted plenty of conversation. We discuss if it’s true and what it means for journalists starting out.
You may not be a dick but Tom Watson MP sort of is. Following the release of his book “Dial M for Murdoch” he was accused by former News of the World reporter Neville Thurlbeck of quoting off the record conversations between them. As of now (Tuesday 24 April 2012 9:04 BST) he hasn’t responded…
And app of the week is a little different this week as Jo talks about his own project, liveblogging software Ocqur.
Stay fresh!
Greetings once more from the Media Mouthwash studio! We have a perfectly distilled 17 minutes of pure journalism Listerine to get the bad taste of declining newspaper revenues out of your mouth.
Actually that’s a bit of a fib because we’re going to be talking newspaper revenues and the struggles to monetise digital. Brian Stelter wrote in the New York Times that for every $1 in digital revenue, newspapers are losing $7 in print advertising. But it aint all bad news.
The Daily is a year old. Murdoch launched his iPad publication last March and we see how it’s faring. The results are a little surprising.
Gaffe of the week isn’t its usual light hearted self. This week’s gaffe comes from a newspaper that has ruined someones life. And another. And another.
And finally, Joseph’s app of the week is Zite. It’s not new, it’s not the first of its kind but we discuss why it’s the best personal news app out there.
Stay fresh and thanks for listening!
On this week’s Media Mouthwash we give our early reaction to the new Wikileaks release. Hacker collective Anonymous handed over to Assange & co. millions of emails from the private intelligence agency Stratfor. Is this a big deal or is it as the Atlantic suggests, a damp squib?
The Sun on Sunday came out on Sunday and sold 3.2 million copies instantly becoming the top Sunday paper. Was it a return to the barnstorming journalism of the News of the World? Well, no, not exactly.
Daniel tootled off to the Digital Editors’ Network meeting held at Salford Quays and caught up with Sarah Hartley of Guardian Media project n0tice. Keen observers may already know about the hyperlocal noteiceboard website but we find out n0tice’s plans for expansion and what we can expect from the service going forward.
And finally, unofficial Tsar of Storify, Joseph Stashko runs us through their new app for iPad in App of the Week.
Stay fresh.
The Sun on Sunday was announced this week and we try our best not to talk about it. But we fail and talk about it a lot. Daniel attempts an impression of Rupert Murdoch biographer Michael Wolff but Joseph doesn’t allow it, so here’s the man himself gaffing it up.
Anthony DeRosa was working away in the financial products team at Reuters until he was bitten by a Tumblr shaped radioactive spider and became Social-Media-Editor-Man. We find out how. (thanks TWiT)
The Freedom of Information Act, it may sound dull, we may make it sound even duller but it’s important and under threat.
And finally as Joseph hands over App of the Week to Daniel he chooses Software Data Cable. Crap name, great app.
Footnote: Here’s that riveting read on Freedom of Information Act and local government.
We could probably do a This Week in Joey Barton podcast if we tried hard enough. The controversial footballer reinvented as a sixth former’s Morrissey (who himself is a sixth former’s Oscar Wilde) isn’t known for keeping his trap shut. But this week a series of tweets regarding John Terry’s race trial caught media and legal eyes.
Path, the ‘personal network’ app for iPhone and Android has been in a spot of bother this week after it emerged that the app uploaded users’ address books to their servers. Is this a big privacy breach or is everyone doing it? We take a look.
Sky News are gaffe of the week for their social media memo. Did #savefieldproducer save @fieldproducer? If only we’d recorded this after Sky News made Daniel delete his tweets…
Banjo is Jo’s app of the week. The app allows people to discover all public tweets/facebook messages sent from a specified location. We look at how journalists can use it.
PS: Thanks for all your comments on Episode 5. If you’ve got any suggestions for Episode 7 and beyond tweet us!
Pinterest is hot shit at the moment. Sites are falling over themselves to report their impressive traffic and referral numbers and the impact of curation. Is it a niche social network or something with a use for all of us?
UNILAD are a bunch of dicks, we discuss why.
Also, we look at Twitter’s censorship policy and why it’s not all bad and discuss the joint project from Columbia University and Stanford.
Media Mouthwash Episode 4 by Media Mouthwash
On this week’s slightly shorter Media Mouthwash we discuss Tumblr, reblogging and death! Every so often a false death rumour appears via social media, why is this? And should credible news outlets do better to fact check? This with our regular features gaffe and app of the week.
Felix Salmon - Tumblr surpasses 15 billion page views
Media Mouthwash Episode 3 by Media Mouthwash
Media Mouthwash is back after a Christmas hiatus!
The Guardian’s iPad app was met with a mixed reaction when it launched in October 2011. Many loved the beautiful design, others were confused by the ‘static’ edition model they used to package it.
Our guest this week is Martin Belam of the Guardian’s UX (user experience) team. He talks us through the rationale behind the design of the app and the different ways people consume news.
All this and our regular features!
Martin Belam (twitter) - Currybet.net
App of the week - Panorama 360
AP opens North Korea bureau
Facebook gives Politico access to election status messages
The data behind MediaCityUK job applications
Media MouthWash Episode 2 by Media Mouthwash
This week we’re back with a slightly shorter, leaner podcast that still manages to cram in plenty of media discussion and analysis. We’re talking news design - taking apart the Independent’s new makeover, speaking to Grig Davidovitz, CEO of RGB Media, as well as the usual items Gaffe and App of the fortnight
Corrections: Grig Davidovitz was editor of Haaretz websites. He is an expert in journalism and new media, not design.
InkThink - What the Independent re-design tells us
French satirical newspaper firebombed after prophet Mohammed announcement
Here’s a handy companion to the discussion on the Independent’s redesign. Look at how different websites have treated the same story differently. Who handles it best?
Media Mouthwash Episode 1 by Media Mouthwash
After the beta adventure that was Show 0.1, we get stuck into our first proper, (slightly) more polished episode. On the agenda this time is press regulation as well as discussing the implication of new Facebook apps and sharing settings. All that along with our regular items Gaffe and App of the fortnight.
Shownotes
Janine Gibson - How should press regulation work?
Daniel Bentley - Big media is at the mercy of the tech giants and their own fault
Joseph Stashko - We don’t pay for news and never have
Mathew Ingram - Memo to media: A Facebook app is not innovation
Introducing the Guardian’s new Facebook app
Malcolm Coles - Hugely embarassing: Daily Mail jumps gun on Amanda Knox guilty story
Media Mouthwash Episode 0.1 by Media Mouthwash
In our first show we discuss what happened at Barcamp Media City, mull over what the role of universities should be in the development of journalism and introduce the first editions of our regular items, Gaffe and App of the fortnight.
Shownotes
Andy Dickinson - Daily Mail student media awards?
Andy Dickinson - The role of universities: the carnival of journalism lives!
Johann Hari - A personal apology
Disgraced columnist writes for New York Times Book Review
The past weekend I’ve been at Barcamp MediaCity, an event for techies and other assorted creative types held in the typical barcamp/unconference style in the BBC’s new Salford home.
I attended a wide range of stimulating sessions, and also gathered some audio for the first Media Mouthwash podcast. There wasn’t too much that was directly dealing with journalism (just the one session), but plenty of ideas and concepts that can be applied to journalism.
It also made a change (for me at least) to attend an event that wasn’t centred around the future/funding/new technology (delete as appropriate) of journalism - instead one that had a much broader and liberal agenda around technology.
Suffice it to say you’ll hear plenty about who I met at Barcamp when we launch a week tomorrow, so stay tuned.
- Jo
The Media Mouthwash team, well, the two of us, held our first production meeting today. Despite the disappointing “cappuccino” (pictured) we set down a lot of ideas about what we want the podcast to be and what we need to do to in practical terms.
We want the podcast to be about 25 minutes long and aim to publish it fortnightly starting from September 26th.
Me and Jo shoot the breeze about journalism constantly and the podcast will be a more constructed form of this. We’ll be discussing topical media issues with some forward thinking thrown in. It will be as much a learning exercise for ourselves producing it as for those who are listening.
We aim to have at least one guest per episode, so those of you we know with a bit of expertise, expect a tweet or an email asking you for your time.
Before all this we need to get the technical stuff nailed so we’ll be producing a few demos in the next week.
Many thanks for the team at Soundcloud for offering to host the podcast, and many thanks to those who have already expressed an interest. We’re not expecting perfection with the first episode but hopefully we’ll be able to produce something interesting and thought provoking.
For now you can follow us on Twitter (@MediaMouthwash), and we’ll also have an RSS that you can subscribe to via iTunes and podcast apps.
-Daniel
At CUNY’s Tow-Knight Center for Entrepreneurial Journalism, we invited John Paton, CEO of Digital First Media, Journal Register, and Media News, and Justin Smith, CEO of Atlantic Media, to answer questions about how they are executing their digital first strategies. I interviewed them, digging down into revenue, costs, transition for staff, audience, and advertisers, and more.
| Jeff Bezos - Image by James Duncan Davidson http://www.flickr.com/photos/oreilly/6629223/ |
|
hide details 15:21 (5 hours ago)
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Alan Rusbridger: open newspaper, open news. |
You're our readers, you're important to us, let us know what's important to you.
How are changes in technology and audience behaviour affecting news values, shapes and structures?
Today, publishers as a breed have so far tried little more than reproducing their old content and business models in new forms, from CD-ROMs to the web to iPads. It was the same in the Renaissance. The earliest publishers made books to mimic the work of scribes, even designing their typefaces to look like scribes’ handwriting. Printing was promoted as automated writing. “They appear not to have perceived the printed book as a fundamentally different form, but rather as a manuscript book that could be produced with greater speed and convenience,” Leah Marcus says in “Cyberspace Renaissance.” They didn’t yet see the possibilities.
But there’s another aspect of these launches that’s troubling, and that’s the pride so many publishers seem to take in having produced a Facebook app, as though it’s the pinnacle of media innovation.
But if all you are doing is creating widgets for people who live inside a specific walled garden, then I think you are missing the boat.
Before Mary Hamilton showed me the error of my ways I blindly swallowed Zuckerberg's maxim that a better web is created if we all operate under our real name. I do still believe, that where possible, it is better to use your real name. But this should be encouraged, rather than obligatory. A more nuanced approach is needed.
Krishnan Guru Murthy - Duncan Bannatyne is right to be angry - but we can't let the cowards get to us
There are plenty of anonymous cowards on the internet who abuse others, spread hatred and distribute obscene criminal material. And there are anonymous heroes on the internet too, who fight repression, spread inspiration, ideas, wit and truth. It is entirely understandable that Facebook, Google and others would want to stamp on the bad by ending anonymity, but they have not yet done enough to show how they would preserve the good.
As Randi Zuckerberg recently argued, if people were forced to reveal their identities online most would be less aggressive and more thoughtful. But without anonymity we would be starved of tweets from Egypt, Syria, Iran and repressive regimes around the world where internet anonymity is unleashing new freedoms and ideas. We might lose the mobile phone videos that tell us what is really going on in Hama, the whistleblowers who reveal corruption and the brave insiders who leak the things the powerful try to keep from us. And yes, we'd miss some of the gossip. It is not clear how anonymity online could ever be stamped out altogether. But the likes of Facebook and Google need to show how they would support the free flow of important information if widespread anonymity was lost.
Discussing Google's rather stringent real name policy on Google+, I rather arrogantly assumed that...
But I'm not so convinced now that we can ignore these edge cases. I'm a white, straight, adult male living in Britain. I'm not the type of person who needs protecting online. But there's plenty who do, including unfortunately, a lot of women and sexualities. Problems described in this blogpost by Denise Paolucci. Indeed in a talk I gave to the Preston Social, one woman spoke up from the audience that she'd been targeted by an internet stalker and now has to take extraordinary measures online so that she can interact normally with her friends, as his her right.
So many of the problems on the internet are about user culture. Different websites and services breed their own types of culture. Reddit has a fantastic community which helps each other, laughs with/at each other and roots out spammers, evil doers and trolls. Interestingly, Reddit users mostly go by pseudonyms. Different newspapers have different cultures in their comment sections. The Guardian's has a totally different tone and attitude to that of the Daily Mail, indicative of their respective readerships.
What I propose is a rewards system for being good citizens of the web, a system recognising respect and standing. This is prime for someone like Google or Facebook to take on, but they must revisit their policies on pseudonyms. You can be a pseudonym and a great web citizen.
Just as you can Like or +1 a status or content shared on Facebook/G+, we could instead +1/Like users who have been helpful in comment threads, or have created helpful blogposts. This could create a web-wide system of trust. By looking at a ranking you could see how trusted/respected/liked/friendly someone is.
This is just a suggestion and a tad simplistic. The major social players no doubt have teams of people dedicated to solving problems such as these. When the problems are resolved, we'll hopefully have a better web.
Trinity Mirror journalist, David Higgerson, blogged yesterday discussing whether online comments were worth the bother.
Trolls, nastiness, timewasters, spam are all potential problems when news stories and opinion pieces are open to user comments. But despite these problems, turning comments off is the last thing news orgs should be doing.
Sarah Hartley in the comments made this great point:
With news, if the only invite is to comment on what’s been delivered from on high it could be quite frustrating for a reader who knows something about the topic. If the readers felt more empowered, more listened to and more part of the process they would be less fighty. Bloggers are generally more willing to involve the reader in the process – something that news sites could learn from perhaps?
I'm going to take a punt and guess that at some point this week you've watched a rolling news channel.
OMG. Amy Winehouse. Exceptional talent and a really nice lady. RIP
Pitch: A site that lets you create your own travel blog or food blog based on geolocation check-ins.
Net neutrality is an issue we should all be paying attention to. Net neutrality is the proposal that all information on the internet should be free and open, and not subject to control by ISPs, government and content providers. If the net were not neutral, networks could slow down access to some video sites, while speeding the performance of commercial partners. Essentially, people in different countries, on different ISPs, get a different internet.
In his draft Bill of Rights in Cyberspace, Jeff Jarvis states:
All bits are created equal
This matters to all citizens of the internet. But non-net neutrality could have implications for journalists and news media orgs. If ISPs were allowed to operate in a non-neutral manner, then it's no stretch to imagine Sky Broadband promoting Sky and News Corp sites over the BBC and commercial rivals.
The chair of the US Federal Communications Commision, effectively their Ofcom, Julis Genachowski, has expressed in far more eloquent words than my own why net neutrality is important, and why the web is under thread.
Net neutrality statement by Julius Genachowski, the FCC chair, on Dec. 21, 2010 http://d1.scribdassets.com/ScribdViewer.swf?document_id=45749183&access_key=key-5xzwd89js9ucplra9jd&page=1&viewMode=list
The lord chief justice today opened the way for the reporting of some court proceedings by journalists using Twitter, texting and email, but made clear it was unlikely to happen where such use of social mediacould influence witnesses.
Media organisations and journalists can apply for permission to use social media on a case-by-case basis, but Lord Judge said it may be necessary to bar its use by non-journalists to ensure the "proper adminstration of justice", prevent distractions in court and limit the potential for interference with courts' own recording equipment.
Is this the death knoll for shorthand?
Full text below.
Guardian's Nick Davies at the City University debate on the News of the World and phone-hacking: "I should start off by apologising to the News of the World, in a way I feel sorry for them. It's sheer fluke and bad luck that particular newspaper is the subject of all this attention. It's just because one journalist [Royal correspondent] Clive Goodman got caught... All of us know very well that illegal activity was going on in most Fleet Street newsrooms."
followed by
Ex-News of the World journalist Paul McMullan also at the City University debate on phone-hacking: "I remember seeing an episode of Friends where somebody did it to Monica's phone."
The announcement of Chrome OS and the release of the development hardware the Cr48 has been met with much derision. "Why would I use this? I can't do this on it..." etc.
But there's one person Chrome OS is perfect for, my mum. My Mum is 48 years old and only this year did I teach her how to email and browse the web. She runs a holiday cottage and needed to learn the skills for taking and tracking bookings. I taught her GMail as her email client and Google Calendar to keep track of bookings. This cloud approach meant I could see bookings and emails when my mum was away and handle them for her. This is all my Mum does. Browse the web, check her emails, use Google calendar. The rest of the operating system on her Mac mini is a hindrance and a confusion. She doesn't need to or want to learn how to compose on Garageband, edit video in iMovie. She just wants the web. I'm a heavy user of my Macbook Pro but today I tested myself. How do I use my computer? I gave myself a Chrome OS challenge. I modified Chrome so it went fullscreen, hid my dock and the Apple menu bar and I have lived inside the browser. Not once, all day, have I exited this view. TweetDeck for Chrome more than adequately handles my communication needs. I have a pin for GMail, for Calendar and for Reader. I'm not a big listener of my music on my computer anyway, but I'm able to play the occasional song on YouTube. If there was a Spotify web interface, it'd kill iTunes for me. I do use video and photo editing software on a semi-regular basis, and that's when I'd need a full featured OS. Ideally I'd dual boot, mostly into the instant on Chrome OS, and fire up OS X for more heavy duty tasks. People will continue to sneer, but I'm extremely excited by Chrome OSThe new stripped down version of The Independent called "i" launched yesterday making it the first quality daily to launch in Britain since The Independent itself in 1986.
I can't write about i for the rest of this post by its actual title (I think i...) so from now on it's called The i. Too confusing already.
But title aside this is an impressive paper. It unashamedly targets itself at public transport commuters, those who would normally pick up a Metro or have it shoved into their hands. But The i isn't free, it's 20p, still cheap by any newspaper's standards, but it is competing with a freesheet.
So the question is, is it 20p better than the Metro?
Well not only is it 20p better than the Metro it's 80p cheaper than papers that are too bulky for the average working person to read on a daily basis.
News, opinion, business and sports stories are broken down into matrices for the time constrained. International stories take up a two page matrix called Panorama. The stories are short, a paragraph or two, but it is just enough to inform the reader.
Many stories are then written in full, with fact boxes provided to give basic background information in a non-patronising manner.
One can comfortably read the entire newspaper in under an hour. This is exactly what a daily newspaper should be. It doesn't play dumb, it doesn't over simplify but it's not overly complex. It's baby bear's porridge, it's just right.
The only issue for me is the future sustainability. The newspaper can't be produced for 20p. It relies on people still paying £1 for The Independent. But this newspaper will cannibalise plenty of The Indy's readers, myself included. It will hope to make this up in selling newspapers to people who don't usually buy them. I hope it can, this is a great newspaper.
Start-ups are fighting a war for talent in Silicon Valley, and the companies that actively welcome men and women are going to win it. Smart companies don't recruit "brogrammers."
I figured that blogging communities would form and out of that would come new products and businesses, and products that more closely match the way people really are, not the way the companies imagine we are. I've been inside enough companies to know how badly companies abstract the needs and wants of users.
The Ministry of Defence has confirmed a device which can be used as a "sonic weapon" will be deployed in London during the Olympics.
Is it possible to survive on the Internet using Bing and only Bing?
Former News International chief tells Leveson inquiry that reports prime minister sent her dozens of texts a day are preposterous
Sarah Tressler, the Houston Chronicle society reporter who was fired in March shortly after the Houston Press exposed she also moonlighted as a stripper at Houston’s high-end gentlemen clubs—and blogged about it under the alias ‘Angry Stripper’—is now suing the Chronicle for gender discrimination.
This is what happens when you take people from outside of tech, in this case Michael Pachter, an analyst at Wedbush Securities (based in LA), and collide them with topics that they don’t understand, in this case, Mark Zuckerberg’s wardrobe.
Online multimedia production has for a few years now come with the guidance to ‘chunk’ content: instead of producing linear content, as you would for a space in a linear broadcast schedule, you split your content into specific chunks of material that each tackles a different aspect of the issue or story being covered.
Facebook 's flotation is a landmark moment in internet and media history, but the relationship between the era-defining social networking service and the established media ecosystem is complex and fraught.
I am absolutely fascinated by the mechanics of storytelling. I admitted as much at news:rewired last year when I was invited to talk about new forms of storytelling in journalism. But in exploring some of these brilliant new platforms – Twitter, Storyful, Storify, even online video – we forget that storytelling itself is not a new thing. It is, of course, ancient.